Molnar v. United Technologies Otis Elevator’s Empirical Analysis
37 F.3d 335 · 1994
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2012
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)
Relies on Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Thurston · Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins · Crestar Bank v. Neal (In re Kitchin Equipment Co. of Virginia, Inc.) · United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Century Broadcasting Corp. · United States v. Best
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the evidence presented, combined with all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from it, is sufficient to support the verdict when viewed in the light most favorable to the party winning the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the employer knew or showed reckless disregard for the matter of whether its conduct was prohibited by the ADEA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.