Carson Harbor Village Ltd. v. City of Carson’s Empirical Analysis
37 F.3d 468 · 1994
Citation profile
48 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably WMX Technologies, Inc. v. Miller (1997), Diego Militia v. Reno (1996)
48 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Warth v. Seldin · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A generally applicable rent-control ordinance will survive a substantive due process challenge if it is “designed to accomplish an objective within the government’s police power, and if a rational relationship existed between the provisions and the purpose of the ordinances.” This deferential inquiry does not focus on the ultimate effectiveness of the law, but on whether the enacting body could have rationally believed at the time of enactment that the law would promote its objective.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A landowner who purchased land after an alleged taking cannot avail himself of the Just Compensation Clause because he has suffered no injury. The price paid for the property presumably reflected the market value of the property minus the interests taken.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In the takings context, the basis of a facial challenge is that the very enactment of the statute has reduced the value of the property or has effected a transfer of a property interest.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.