Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 F.3d 489 - United States v. One Piper Cherokee Aircraft Tail No N 5538v Including Its Tools and Appurtenances a McCullough

United States v. One Piper Cherokee Aircraft Tail No N 5538v Including Its Tools and Appurtenances a McCullough’s Empirical Analysis

37 F.3d 489 · 1994

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
3
states following
May 1998
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 10 district · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 981 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 19 U.S.C. § 1615 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 853 (§ 413 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1355

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · United States v. Halper · United States v. Dixon · Austin v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “of forfeiture actions precludes consideration of post-filing evidence in making the probable cause determination. United States v. $191,-910.00 in U.S. Currency, 16 F.3d 1051 , 1071 (9th Cir.1994). Accordingly, in our de novo review of the determination of probable cause, we consider only evidence that the record discloses was developed prior to the institution of this action. 8 . This fact distinguishes Robinson v. Hanrahan, 409 U.S. 38 , 93 S.Ct. 30 , 34 L.Ed.2d 47 (1972), relied upon by McCullough. In that case,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “civil forfeiture under [21 U.S.C.] Sec. 881(a)(4) can be predicated upon some offense other than those for which [claimant/defendant] has already been tried”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[t]wo statutory offenses represent the same offense for double jeopardy purposes unless 'each [offense] requires proof of a fact which the other does not.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.