United States v. Rubin’s Empirical Analysis
37 F.3d 49 · 1994
Citation profile
22 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably United States v. Quinones (2007), United States of America v. James J. McDermott, Jr. (2001)
22 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1344
Relies on Blanton v. General Electric Credit Corp. · Oklahoma v. New Mexico · Pope v. Illinois · City of El Centro v. United States · Fields v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The process of empaneling a jury is firmly entrusted to the sound discretion of the trial judge and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of this discretion.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“did not necessarily suggest that Gannon worked as an adult film star. 31 While we may disagree with a district court's evidentiary ruling, our disagreement is not alone sufficient to reverse an otherwise rational, carefully considered and non-arbitrary decision. Reviewing the district court's ruling in the light that most minimizes its prejudicial effect, we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the stage name”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'maximizing its probative value and minimizing its prejudicial effect.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.