Whalen v. Randle’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Lindh v. Murphy · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · Schlup v. Delo · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“requires petitioner to `show that it is more likely than not' that no reasonable juror would have found [him] guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in light of all the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Allen v. Yukins“have confidence in the outcome of the trial unless the court is also satisfied that the trial was free of nonharmless constitutional error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Allen v. Yukins“decline to reach the question of whether the Constitution requires an actual-innocence exception to [28 U.S.C.] § 2244(d)(1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Allen v. Yukins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.