Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

37 F. App'x 76

Redd v. Sailor

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided June 6, 2002

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-06-06

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2005

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-06-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Derrick Redd appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting summary judgment to prison officials and dismissing his civil rights complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s memo*77randum opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Redd v. Sailor, No. CA-00-442-AM (E.D. Va. filed Feb, 13, 2002; entered Feb. 14, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

¶3 This case was decided by a magistrate judge exercising jurisdiction upon consent of the parties. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).
/37/fappx/76 · .json · Public domain