Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 FAPPX 901 - Parks v. Locating, Inc.

Parks v. Locating, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 2016
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 207

Relies on 149 Madison Ave Corporation v. Asselta · Brennan v. Valley Towing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an agreement to compensate a minimum of forty hours is not the same as an agreement to pay a fixed salary for all hours worked, nor can extra overtime payments cure a basic failure to meet the requirements of § 778.114.” (Pl. Mot. at 15 (quotation marks omitted).) Not only is this authority not binding on this Court, .but the compensation scheme in that case presents precisely the opposite calculation from the methodology employed by Defendant here. In Parks , the defendant employer”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.