Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 FLA 307 - Frazier v. Boggs

Frazier v. Boggs’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
5
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2014

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

701896190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cullum v. Branch of the Bank of Alabama · Benedict v. Lynch · Livingston v. Newkirk · Youngs v. . Youngs · Holland v. Holmes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““At law, in such cases, time is generally held to be of the essence of the contract; but, in addition to this, the parties here have, expressly made the time stipulated for the performance of their mutual obligations an essential feature of this contract. The plaintiffs, in order to recover, must therefore have been thus ready, able, and willing to convey such perfect title promptly at the time expressly stipulated. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.