Martin v. Perinni Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Krauth v. Israel Geller and Buckingham Homes, Inc. · Ala Inc v. Ccair Inc Ala H · D.P. Enterprises, Inc. v. Bucks County Community College · Foldi v. Jeffries
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidenced by board certification or by devotion of the person's practice substantially to the general area or specialty involved in the action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“This result is consistent with the purpose of the [a]ffidavit of [m]erit statute. The statute was designed to require plaintiffs to make a threshold showing that their claims have merit. It would thwart this purpose to require plaintiffs who make negligence claims against architectural corporations organized under N.J.S.A. 45:3-18 [which obtain architect licenses] to file affidavits of merit while excusing plaintiffs who make negligence claims against architectural corporations organized under N.J.S.A. 14A:17-5 [which are not so licensed] from satisfying this requirement. [ Ibid. (emphasis added).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) whether the action is for “damages for personal injuries, wrongful death or property damage” (nature of injury); (2) whether the action is for “malpractice or negligence” (cause of action); and (3) whether the “care, skill or knowledge exercised or exhibited in the treatment, practice or work that is the subject of the complaint fell outside acceptable professional or occupational standards or treatment practices” (standard of care).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.