Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Ill. 2d 404 - Zeve v. Levy

37 Ill. 2d 404 - Zeve v. Levy’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
October 2005
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently October 2005 · most notably 115 Ill. 2d 294 - Szajna v. General Motors Corp. (1986), 63 Ill. 2d 31 - Smith v. D.R.G., Inc. (1976)

49 state decisions

32019671970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 11 Ill. 2d 447 - Cherin v. R. & C. COMPANY · 29 Ill. 2d 542 - Urban v. Lois, Inc. · 36 Ill. 2d 241 - Dahlke v. Hawthorne, Lane & Co. · 15 Ill. 2d 388 - Southmoor Bank & Trust Co. v. Willis · Graham v. O'Connor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[Pjetitioner’s failure to receive notice of the tax-deed proceeding does not, per se, entitle her to have the deed set aside. (Dahlke.) Nor does the fact that respondent’s agent could have made more thorough inquiry and a more diligent search than he did necessarily establish fraud on the part of respondent in the absence of proof of wrongful intent or a pattern of deception. (Dahlke.)” ( 37 Ill. 2d 404, 409 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The precise question, therefore, for determination here is whether the record before us establishes a prima facie case of fraud, for if it does the trial court’s denial of the section 72 petition at the close of petitioner’s proof was erroneous. If not, that action was proper.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.