Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 ILLAPP 641 - Moore v. People

Moore v. People’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
February 1943
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1943

5 state decisions

30189119001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Kinne · Bruner v. Madison County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““At common law, there were no costs eo nomine. The unsuccessful party was amerced for his false claim, but not punished with costs as such. State v. Kinne, 41 N. H. 238; Bac. Ab., title ‘Costs’; 3 Black. Com. 399. Costs are the creature of the statute, and neither in England nor in this country are costs allowed to or against any party to an action or proceeding, except as authorized by statute.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““In all criminal cases where the fees cannot be collected of the party convicted, or where the prosecution fails, the county board may, in its discretion, direct that the cost of the prosecution, or so much thereof as shall seem just and equitable, shall be paid out of the county treasury.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““It is very clear that the allowance of fees or costs by the county board is, under that section, a condition precedent to the existence of any legal claim for such fees or costs against the county. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.