37 Ill. App. 2d 41 - Jackson v. Gordon’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““* * "We feel constrained to point out, however, that, since the trial conference for the settling of instructions has not been abstracted, it has, therefore, not been shown to this court that the necessary specific objection to the complained-of instruction was made at that time. (Taylor v. Elgin, J. & E. Ry. Co., 33 Ill. App. 2d 64, 77 , 178 N.E.2d 704 ; Thompson v. Chicago & E. I. Ry. Co., 32 Ill. App. 2d 397, 401 , 178 N.E.2d 151 ; Greenlee v. John G. Shedd Aquarium, 31 Ill. App. 2d 402, 411 , 176 N.E.2d 684 ; and cases therein cited.) The point is, therefore, not preserved for our consideration, as a court of review is not required to search the record to find grounds for ^reversal, even though it may do so to affirm. (Richman Chemical Co. v. Lowenthal, 16 Ill. App. 2d 568, 571 ; and numerous other decisions to the same effect.)””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 39 Ill. App. 3d 919 - Wolfe v. Bertrand Bowling Lanes, Inc.