Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Ill. App. 2d 475 - Kropp Forge Co. v. Jawitz

37 Ill. App. 2d 475 - Kropp Forge Co. v. Jawitz’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
12
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 4 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc. (1965), In-Flight Devices Corp. v. Van Dusen Air, Inc. (1972)

15 federal appellate · 4 district · 36 state decisions — followed in 12 states

3601962197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. The ultimate test is the substance of the act rather that the quantity. The criteria “cannot be simply mechanical or quantitative.” 186 N. E.2d at 79 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ * * * [D]ue process requires only that in order to subject a defendant to a judgment in personam, if he be not present within the territory of the forum, he have certain minimum contacts with it such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.’ ” « * ‡ ‡ “But to the extent that a corporation exercises the privilege of conducting activities within a state, it enjoys the benefits and protection of the laws of that state. The exercise of that privilege may give rise to obligations, and, so far as those obligations arise out of or are connected with the activities within the state, a procedure which requires the corporation to respond to a suit brought to enforce them can, in most instances, hardly be said to be undue.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(t)he transaction of any business within this State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.