Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 ILLCTCL 104 - Peterson v. State

Peterson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 1996
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 85 Ill. 2d 1 - Alvis v. Ribar · 55 Ill. App. 3d 123 - American State Bank v. County of Woodford · 56 Ill. App. 2d 385 - Eggimann v. Wise · Lee v. State · Bovey v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Given the fact that the events surrounding the accident are consistent with the phenomenon known as tire nibbling, and given the testimony that indicated that there was a three to six inch drop-off along the shoulder, we believe that more likely than not the accident was at least in part proximately caused by the fact that decedent tried to bring his car back onto the road at a point which had a drop-off contrary to recognized safety standards. It is further undisputed that there were no signs warning the decedent of the dangerous condition.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.