Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 263

Stephenson v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided January 31, 1985

Court of Claims of Illinois · decided 1985-01-31

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-01-31

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 2000

4 state decisions

20198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Raucci, J.

¶1This is a claim for the loss of items of personal property when Claimant was taken from the disciplinary segregation unit at the Menard Correctional Center to the health-care unit of the institution on April 27,1983.

¶2There is no dispute that the State took possession of Claimant’s property and that it was not returned to him. The problem presented by this case is the value to be placed on the lost items.

¶3In the portion of his complaint entitled bill of particulars, Claimant described the items as follows:

“(9) Nine years accumulation of legal files, books and records including but not limited to the following, (4) Illinois Criminal Law and Procedures (1977 to 1980) (5) Illinois Legal Directories, 8 Litigation Manuals, complete records and transcripts of appeals, post-conviction, conviction and approximately six civil actions, including exhibits, all of which was photostatically reproduced for the claimant at cost. Claimant seeks an estimated $850.00 for his losses.”

¶4He testified that the four copies of the Illinois Criminal Code were paperbacks, that he had a Black’s Legal Dictionary, and four legal directories of the type that are published annually. He lost the transcript of his 1975 trial in Cook County, the transcript consisting of at least 500 pages. He lost the transcripts of his post-conviction proceedings and the briefs and transcript of his post-conviction appeal, plus material pertaining to certain Federal actions, some apparently still pending.

¶5He offered no proof as to what it would cost him to replace these documents, and the record fails to disclose that he actually has a need for them. The age and nature of the material supports the amount of $300.00 as fair and reasonable compensation for his loss.

¶6It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that Claimant be awarded three hundred ($300.00) dollars in full and complete satisfaction of this claim.

/37/illctcl/263 · .json · Public domain