Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 IND 111 - Coghill v. State

Coghill v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1871

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
4
states following
April 1925
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 1925

19 state decisions

50187118801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blain v. Bailey · Tyson v. Postlethwaite

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ We are clearly of the opinion that the last act does not cover the entire subject-matter of the former act, and that there is no irreconcilable repugnancy between the two acts. They can stand together. Both can be executed. There is nothing in this case to induce us to relax the strict rules of construction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.