Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

37 Ind. 179

State v. Jones

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1871

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1871-11-15

<p>Criminal Law.—Practice-—Bill of -Exceptions-—A bill of exceptions was signed and filed in a criminal case, after, the close of the term, without leave having been granted during the term for an extension of time.</p> <p>Pleld, that the bill of exceptions formed no'part of the record, even if time beyond the term in which to file the bill could have been given,</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1921

1 state decisions

Cited in Anderson (1889)’s definition of “Funeral”

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1871-11-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Worden, C. J.

¶1This was an information against the appellee for assault and battery. The court dismissed the prosecution and discharged the defendant without trial. The State appeals and seeks to reverse the order dismissing the cause and discharging the defendant.

¶2The ground -of the action of the court was such as can be made to appear only by a bill of exceptions.

¶3In vacation after the close of the term at which the pro- . ceedings were had, a bill of exceptions was signed and filed, setting forth the ground of the. .action of the court. Time was not given beyond the term, even if it could be in a criminal cause, in which to file a bill of exceptions. The bill of exceptions clearly came too late, and cannot be regarded as a part of the record. The statute provides that “all bills of exceptions in a criminal prosecution must be made out *180and presented to the judge at the time of the trial, or within, such time thereafter during the term as the court may allow, signed by the judge and filed by the clerk. The exception must be taken at the time of the decision.” 2 G. & H. 420, sec. 120.

y. W. Robinson and B. W. Hanna, Attorney General, for the State.

¶4The judgment below is affirmed.

/37/ind/179 · .json · Public domain