Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

37 Ind. App. 127

Townsend v. Meneley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1905

Indiana Court of Appeals · decided 1905-05-11

<p>1. Descent and Distribution. — Illegitimate Children. — Common Law. — At the common law an illegitimate child was not an heir of its deceased father, p. 129.</p> <p>2. Same. — Illegitimate Children. — Statutes.—Under §2630 Burns 1901, §2475 R. S. 1881, Acts 1853, p. 78, §1, an illegitimate child could inherit from its father only where such father left no legal heirs within the United States, nor legitimate children without the United States, p. 129.</p> <p>3. Same. — Illegitimate Children. — Statutes.—Repeal.—The act of 1901 (Acts 1901, p. 288, §2630a Burns 1901), providing that illegitimate children shall be heirs of their fathers under certain circumstances, repeals the act of 1853 (Acts 1853, p. 78, §1, §2630 Burns 1901, §2475 R. S. 1881) upon the same subject, p. 130.</p> <p>4. Words and Phrases.- — “Acknowledge.”—The word “acknowledge” means to admit, to own, to confess or to recognize a truth or fact. p. 131.</p> <p>5. Statutes. — Construction.—Meaning of Words. — In the construction of a statute words are to be given their ordinary meaning unless that would defeat the manifest intent, p. 132.</p> <p>6. Descent and Distribution. — Illegitimate Children. — Burden of Proof. — The burden of proof to establish that plaintiff, is the illegitimate child of her father and that he acknowledged her to be his child, is upon plaintiff, p. 132.</p> <p>7. Same. — Illegitimate Children.- — Acknowledgment.—Evidence.— Where decedent told respective witnesses that the plaintiff, an illegitimate child, “was dead sure mine;” “was his’n;” was the only child he had; “she [plaintiff’s mother] had had a child and it was his’n,” acknowledgment of paternity is sufficiently shown, there being no contradictory evidence, p. 132.</p> <p>8. Same. — Heirs.—When Persons Become. — A person becomes an heir at the death of the ancestor, and not before, p. 134.</p> <p>9. Statutes. — Remedial.—Construction.—Descent and Distribution. — Illegitimate Children. — Statutes providing that under certain circumstances illegitimate children shall be heirs of their fathers are remedial and should be liberally construed, p. 134.</p> <p>10. Same. — Retroactive.—Descent and Distribution. — Illegitimate Children. — Under §2630a Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 288, an illegitimate child, acknowledged by the intestate ancestor to be his, such ancestor leaving no legitimate children or descendants thereof, inherits such ancestor’s estate, although such ancestor’s acknowledgment of such child occurred before the taking effect of such statute, and not afterwards, pp. 134, 138.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1905-05-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2010 · most notably Gird v. Bennett (1910), Brownell Improvement Co. v. Nixon (1910)

25 state decisions

70190519101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On Petition fob Reheabing.

Roby, J.

¶210. The petition for a rehearing is based upon the contention that the acknowledgment contemplated by the act of 1901 (Acts 1901, p. 288, §1, §2630a Burns 1901), was an acknowledgment made after the taking effect of said act. The argument supporting the proposition is, briefly, that the father ought to be held to have spoken in the light of the law as it was, and that an acknowledgment ought not to be given a new meaning and effect which he could not at the time have contemplated. The fault with this argument is that it treats the acknowledgment as having to do only with the right of inheritance. The father may be impelled to such acknowledgment by many other than property considerations, promptings of natural affections, emotions of repentance, of pity, a desire to be just and to repair his previous delinquencies, may, any or all of them, furnish an adequate reason for making an acknowledgment, of the truth. It is not an acknowledgment of the right of the child to inherit property that is provided for by statute. It simply specifies what shall be evidence to prove the relation of parent and child under certain circumstances. The effect of such evidence is to make the 'child a member of a class for which provision as to inheritance is made by the legislature. The members of this class are as clearly entitled to inherit under statutes subsequently passed for their benefit, as the legitimate children, prior to the passage of an act relative to the inheritance of property by them, would be entitled to its benefits. It would be illogical in either case to hold that only children born after the legislative enactment could derive benefit therefrom.

¶3Petition for rehearing overruled.

/37/indapp/127 · .json · Public domain