Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 INDAPP 429 - Whitesell v. Study

Whitesell v. Study’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
February 1980
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 1980

12 state decisions

40190619101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stewart v. Sonneborn · Bartlett v. Christhilf · Chipley v. Atkinson · Phelps v. . Nowlen · Gary v. May

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If process, either civil or criminal, is wilfully made use of for a purpose not justified by the law, this is abuse for which an action will lie . . . It is enough that the process was wilfully abused to accomplish some unlawful purpose.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * If a party to an action is injured in his person or property by the deceit or collusion of his attorney, he has a right of action by statute.” * * * (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.