Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 MDAPP 559 - Hennessy v. State

Hennessy v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 1988
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dorsey v. State · Edgington v. United States · Corens v. State · Bagley v. State · 26 Md. App. 511 - Comi v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Finally, appellant asks: ‘Was the Trial Court’s Refusal to Instruct the Jury that Good Character and Reputation of the Appellant in and of Itself May Be Sufficient to Create a Reasonable Doubt of Guilt, Reversible Error?’ The answer is no.” The answer is still no.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Evidence of good character ... “is not proof of innocence although it may be sufficient to raise a doubt of guilt.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.