Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Md. App. 695 - Mazur v. Scavone

37 Md. App. 695 - Mazur v. Scavone’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 2011

13 state decisions

6019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickler Engineering Corp. v. Seminar, Inc. · Fenwick Motor Co. v. Fenwick · White v. Friel · Roland Ex Rel. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Lloyd E. Mitchell, Inc. · Pullman Co. v. Ray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"At no time on that date, or at any other time, did I say that my parents' dog got excited around strangers or that he had previously jumped on anyone. The fact is that the dog was gentle and had never attacked, bothered or threatened anyone prior to [the incident]."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"The Defendant's daughter stated in the Plaintiff's car on the way to the hospital that the dog got excited and nervous around strangers and that they would have to get rid of the dog now because he had previously jumped others."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “knew, or by the exercise of ordinary and reasonable care should have known, of the inclination or propensity of the animal to do the particular mischief that caused the harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.