¶1This ease, as now presented by an amended complaint, is deemed to be in no essential respect different from that-shown by the original complaint, which, upon a former appeal, was-decided to be insufficient to entitle the plaintiff to a remedy upon a judgment, after it had been suffered to expire by lapse of time. Mor*283rill v. Madden, 35 Minn. 493, (29 N. W. Rep. 193.) For reasons set forth in our opinion in that case, the order sustaining this demurrer is affirmed.
37 Minn. 282
Morrill v. Madden
Decided July 25, 1887
Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1887-07-25
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Waseca county, Buckham, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the amended complaint. The decision on a former appeal in this action will be found in 35 Minn. 493.
Relies on Morrill v. Madden
Decided 1887-07-25