Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 MISC2D 693 - Ketcham v. Hall Syndicate, Inc.

Ketcham v. Hall Syndicate, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
4
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably 742 F. Supp. 741 - Don King Productions, Inc. v. Douglas (1990), Chapman v. New York State Division for Youth (2008)

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

801962197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wood v. . Duff-Gordon · Auten v. Auten · Hexamer v. . Webb · Blake v. . Ferris · Ehrenworth v. . Stuhmer Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A contract to render personal service, other than a contract of apprenticeship as provided in Chapter 4 of this division, may not be enforced against the employee beyond seven years from the commencement of service under it. Any contract, otherwise valid, to perform or render service of a special, unique, unusual, extraordinary, or intellectual character, which gives it peculiar value and the loss of which can not be reasonably or adequately compensated in damages in an action at law, may nevertheless be enforced against the person contracting to render such service, for a term not to exceed seven years from the commencement of service under it. If the employee voluntarily continues his service under it beyond that time, the contract may be referred to as affording a presumptive measure of the compensation. ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “specific provision [was] made for termination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.