Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

37 Mo. 182

Bailey v. Kimbrough

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1866

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1866-01-15

This was an action instituted in the Circuit Court for Greene county, by respondent against appellant, on two promissory notes, on which Bailey alleged in his petition a partial payment had been made, but that Kimbrough had obtained possession of the notes by fraud, and wrongful and fraudulent representations, &e., and claimed judgment for the balance of the principal and interest due on said notes.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1871

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1866-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Holmes, Judge,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2The record and bill of exceptions in this case are very defective in form, but enough appears to enable us to see that a judgment was rendered for the plaintiff without any evidence to support it, and when the evidence which was offered by the plaintiff tended to sustain the defence set up in the answer.

¶3The bill of exceptions shows that an application for a change of venue was made,on the day of the trial, and before a jury was called, supported by affidavit of the party, on the ground that the judge had been of counsel in the cause, and that the application was overruled. The facts do not sufficiently appear to enable us to say whether reasonable notice had been given or not, but we are inclined to think a change of venue should have been granted.

¶4We think best to reverse the judgment and remand the case for a new trial, when the rights of the parties may be adjudicated in a more satisfactory manner.

¶5Judgment revéfsed and cause remanded;

the other judges concurring.
/37/mo/182 · .json · Public domain