Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 N.J. 143 - Atkinson v. Parsekian

Atkinson v. Parsekian’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

95
cited by 95 later decisions
8
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 92 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently December 2013 · most notably In Re the Revocation of the License of Polk (1982), David v. Vesta Co. (1965)

3 federal appellate · 92 state decisions

310196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · United States Marcus v. Hess · Helvering v. Mitchell · Stone v. United States · Commonwealth v. Funk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is well settled that the Legislature has the constitutional power to impose both a criminal and civil or administrative sanction in respect to the same act or omission ... The double jeopardy clause merely prohibits attempting a second time to punish criminally for the same offense ... The proceedings before the Director ... are administrative and not criminal, even though they arise out of the commission of an offense punishable by the courts ... Although the suspension or revocation of a driver’s license by the Director may appear to be punishment to the wrongdoer, this is not enough to characterize the statutory grant of power as criminal in nature. The primary object of the statute is to foster safety on the highway and not to impose criminal punishment to vindicate public justice.” 179 A.2d at 738 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a preponderance of the believable evidence”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]here is a grave doubt the Legislature could constitutionally create a court in the executive branch of government. N.J. Const. (1947), Art. III; see State v. Osborn, 32 N.J. 117 (1960).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.