Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 N.J. 328 - Hague v. Williams

Hague v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
15
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 91 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably Bratt v. International Business MacHines Corp. (1984), Payton v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority (1997)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 91 state decisions — followed in 15 states

280196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Driscoll · 8 Utah 2d 191 - Berry v. Moench · Bober v. Independent Plating Corp. · Gilligan v. International Paper Co. · Simonsen v. Swenson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A patient should be entitled to freely disclose his symptoms and condition to his doctor in order to receive proper treatment without fear that those facts may become public property. Only thus can the purpose of the relationship be fulfilled.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We have, then, no expressed public policy pointing to a general prohibition against testimonial revelation of information acquired during the physician-patient relationship, but, on the contrary, our policy is to expose such information to view when it is relevant to the resolution of litigation.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A physician may not reveal the confidences entrusted to him in the course of medical attendance, or the deficiencies he may observe in the character of patients, unless he is required to do so by law or unless it becomes necessary in order to protect the welfare of the individual or of the community.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.