Schultz v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
2 district · 25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently November 1999 · most notably McCauley v. Ray (1968), Den-Gar Enterprises v. Romero (1980)
2 district · 25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. Kidd · Donahue v. Sweeney · State v. Bailey · Cunningham v. Springer · State v. Buck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““§ 21-5-4, [N.M.S.A.1953]. Evidence in support of application — Findings—Bed- ■ sion. — Upon the filing of a motion -for-change of venue, the court may require evidence in support thereof, and' upon hearing thereon shall make findings and-'1 either grant or overrule said motion.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Montoya · Lewis v. Samson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.