Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 NY 591 - Russell v. . Winne

Russell v. . Winne’s Empirical Analysis

1868

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
March 1929
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 4 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1929 · most notably Benedict v. Ratner (1925), Whitney v. Wenman (1905)

4 federal appellate · 4 district · 26 state decisions — followed in 10 states

1001868187018801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith & Hoe v. Acker · Wood v. Lowry · Gardner v. . McEwen · Conkling v. . Shelley · Jackson ex dem. Skinner v. Packard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Why, then, is the mortgage given upon such property? Evidently the better to enable the mortgagor to enjoy the benefit thereof, at the expense of the creditors. Were there no creditors of the mortgagor, there would be no object in giving or taking mortgages accompanied with such an agreement (i. e., an agreement to sell without using the proceeds of sale to reduce the mortgage.)””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““If a mortgage be given with the fraudulent intent to cover up and conceal from creditors a portion of the debtor’s property, it is altogether void, notwithstanding it also includes land or other property in relation to which there is a bona fide intent to convey it as security for an honest debt, and no other purpose and intent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.