37 Ohio App. 2d 23 - Stephens v. Harmony Loan Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We conclude that while a creditor has a right to take reasonable action to pursue his debtor and persuade payment, such action is not reasonable and constitutes an invasion of the right of privacy, malicious and without probable cause, where a creditor or his representative instititutes (sic), on four occasions, proceedings in aid of execution * * * after it knows or should know the wage earner is not, in fact, the judgment debtor * * * [.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the wrongful intrusion into one's private activities in such a manner as to outrage or cause mental suffering, shame or humiliation to a person of ordinary sensibilities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reasonable action to pursue his debtor and persuade payment,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.