Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Ohio App. 2d 7 - In Re Bolden

37 Ohio App. 2d 7 - In Re Bolden’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2008

14 state decisions

701973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Collins · 17 Ohio App. 2d 164 - State v. Whittington · 91 Ohio App. 489 - State v. Theisen · 3 Ohio App. 2d 11 - In Re Estate of Wolfel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although R.C. 2151.23, insofar as it gives jurisdiction to the juvenile court ‘concerning any child who on or about the date specified in the complaint is alleged to be a * * * delinquent * * (emphasis added), implies that several claims of delinquency may be made resulting upon trial in several findings of delinquency, nevertheless, the finding that a child is a delinquent child is the finding of a legal status which status is common to all proceedings tried within the same time reference and which must result in one disposition for all complaints or a separate disposition for each complaint which is consistent with and not mutually exclusive of the disposition made at the same time for another complaint.” In re Bolden (1973), 37 Ohio App.2d 7, 16 , 66 O.O.2d 26, 52 , 306 N.E.2d 166, 173 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “where the dispositional hearing is to be held immediately following the adjudicatory hearing, the court, upon the request of a party, shall continue the hearing for a reasonable time to enable the party to obtain or consult counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.