37 Ohio App. 2d 73 - McCormick v. Haley’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““An actionable invasion of the right of privacy is the unwarranted appropriation or exploitation of one’s personality, the publicizing of one’s private affairs with which the public has no legitimate concern, or the wrongful intrusion into one’s private activities in such a manner as to outrage or cause mental suffering, shame or humiliation to a person of ordinary sensibilities.””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 20 Ohio App. 3d 4 - Prince v. St. Francis-St. George Hospital, Inc. · 68 Ohio App. 3d 665 - Blevins v. Sorrell

2. ““* * * A mere negligent intrusion into one’s private activities does not constitute an actionable invasion of the right of privacy. Thus, if the trier of the facts were to accept, as the trial court did, the defendant’s testimony that the communications were only negligently and not intentionally sent, there could be no right of recovery. * * *” Id. at 78 .”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Hamrick v. Wellman Products Group, Unpublished Decision (9-29-2004) · 20 Ohio App. 3d 4 - Prince v. St. Francis-St. George Hospital, Inc.

3. ““ * * * the trial court, after construing the evidence most strongly in favor of the party against whom the motion is directed, finds that upon any determinative issue reasonable minds could come to but one conclusion upon the evidence submitted and that conclusion is adverse to such party * *”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 64 Ohio App. 3d 745 - Van Horn v. Peoples Banking Co.