Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Ohio App. 3d 65 - State v. Weeks

37 Ohio App. 3d 65 - State v. Weeks’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2020

14 state decisions

5019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Agler · 21 Ohio App. 2d 207 - State v. Hale · Ex parte Januszewski · 69 Ohio App. 2d 24 - State v. Bronaugh · In re Russell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence that the minor committed acts that would constitute a crime if committed by an adult is used only for the purpose of establishing that the minor is delinquent, not to convict him of a crime and to subject him to punishment for that crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Roe v. Heap, Unpublished Decision (5-11-2004) · In Re Estes, Unpublished Decision (9-24-2004)
  2. “with purpose to hinder the discovery, apprehension, prosecution, conviction, or punishment of another for crime, or to assist another to benefit from the commission of a crime, did harbor or conceal such other person, [a juvenile], and the crime committed by the person aided was a felony * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Panzeca
  3. “there was no underlying crime committed by [the juvenile], the person alleged to have been harbored or concealed. Rather, [the juvenile] was adjudged a delinquent and had not committed a crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Panzeca

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.