Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 OHIOST2D 157 - State v. Kulig

State v. Kulig’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

194
cited by 194 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 179 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 194 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably State v. Jenks (1991), State v. Lott (1990)

10 federal appellate · 179 state decisions

620197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 148 Ohio St. 473 - State v. Petro · 100 Ohio App. 345 - State v. Sheppard · Atkins v. State · 115 Ohio St. 350 - State v. Channer · Carter v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 194 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “circumstantial evidence alone is relied upon to prove an element essential to a finding of guilt, it must be consistent only with the theory of guilt and irreconcilable with any reasonable theory of innocence.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Circumstantial evidence and direct evidence inherently possess the same probative value and therefore should be subjected to the same standard of proof. When the state relies on circumstantial evidence to prove an essential element of the offense charged, there is no need for such evidence to be irreconcilable with any reasonable theory of innocence in order to support a conviction. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.