State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 2017
6 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Johnson v. Zerbst · United States v. Crisp · United States v. Nielsen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here a suspect, after being fully apprised of his constitutional rights under Miranda * * *, indicates an understanding of those rights, but subsequently acts in such a way as to reasonably alert the interrogating officer that the warnings given have been misapprehended, the officer must, before any further questioning, insure that the suspect fully understands his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination, as described in Miranda.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““ * * * Although we base our decision here on broader, constitutional grounds, we wish to state that the mandate of both B. C. 2935.14 and 2935.20 is clear, and deviation therefrom should not be countenanced.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.