Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 OHIOST3D 286 - State v. Coleman

State v. Coleman’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

477
cited by 477 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 461 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 477 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Jamison (1990), State v. Brown (1988)

8 federal appellate · 461 state decisions

162019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Enmund v. Florida · State v. Maurer · State v. Jenkins · State v. Bridgeman · Lehman Bros. v. Lilly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 477 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To discharge a court-appointed attorney, the defendant must show a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship of such magnitude as to jeopardize the defendant's right to effective assistance of counsel.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “no person, acting with the kind of culpability required for the commission of an offense, shall * * * aid or abet another in committing the offense[.]”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In any criminal case in which the defendant's motive or intent, the absence of mistake or accident on his part, or the defendant's scheme, plan, or system in doing an act is material, any acts of the defendant which tend to show his motive or intent, the absence of mistake or accident on his part, or the defendant's scheme, plan, or system in doing the act in question may be proved, whether they are contemporaneous with or prior or subsequent thereto, notwithstanding that such proof may show or tend to show the commission of another crime by the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.