Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Okla. 461 - Wellington v. Spencer

Wellington v. Spencer’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
May 1993
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 1993

19 state decisions

80191319201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allison v. Chandler · City of Teree Haute v. Hudnut · Lambert v. Haskell · Chapman v. Kirby · Kaufman & Runge v. Armstrong

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the plaintiff has just made his arrangements to begin business, and he is prevented from beginning either by tort or a breach of contract, or where the injury is to a particular subject-matter, profits of which are uncertain, evidence as to expected profits must be excluded from the jury because of the uncertainty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.