Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Okla. 472 - Long v. Harris

Long v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2008

10 state decisions

501913192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is conceded that permission to.file pleadings out of time rests within the discretion of the court. Section 5646, Comp. Laws' 1909, is as follows: ‘The court, or any judge thereof in vacation, may, 'in his discretion, and upon such terms as may be just, allow an answer or reply to be made, or other act to be done, after the time limited by this act, or by an order enlarge such time.’ This discretion, of course, must be held to mean a. sound judicial discretion, to be exercised justly and fairly in the light of the situation presented. It must not be exercised arbitrarily or in caprice.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.