In Re Jannot’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 21 Wash. App. 326 - Rau v. Liberty Mutual Insurance · 122 Wash. 2d 604 - MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF McDOLE · 103 Wash. 2d 807 - In Re the Marriage of Landry · 50 Wash. 2d 716 - State v. Calkins · 25 Wash. App. 849 - In Re the Marriage of Roorda
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[t]he emotional and financial interests affected by such decisions are best served by finality,'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A party seeking ... modification of a custody decree or parenting plan shall submit together with his [or her] motion, an affidavit setting forth facts supporting the requested order or modification ... [. O]ther parties to the proceedings ... may file opposing affidavits. The court shall deny the motion unless it finds that adequate cause for hearing the motion is established by the affidavits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a local trial judge handles domestic dockets frequently, sometimes exclusively. He or she reviews and considers these questions on a regular basis and is therefore in a much better position than us to pass upon the merits of competing allegations and affidavits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rideout v. Rideout
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.