Baldauf v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sandin v. Conner · Van Pelt v. State Board for Community Colleges & Occupational Education · Kodama v. Johnson · Gilpin County Board of Equalization v. Russell · Mariani v. Colorado Department of Corrections
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]ven absent any due process rights in the administrative proceedings, an inmate may obtain judicial review of the quasi-judicial actions of the DOC pursuant to C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]here is no requirement that a C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) action must be based on alleged constitutional violations.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We perceive no meaningful distinction between the DOC's disciplinary procedures and its administrative segregation procedures in terms of the quasi-judicial nature of these actions”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.