Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 SD 282 - Wolfgram v. Dill

Wolfgram v. Dill’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
March 1986
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 1986

9 state decisions

5019161920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on F. R. Patch Manufacturing Co. v. Protection Lodge No. 215

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““True, there was no direct evidence of a conspiracy; but that is not material. Circumstantial evidence is competent to prove a conspiracy, and, if sufficient to convince the jury, is sufficient in law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.