Dauphine v. Herbert’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2002
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Eusant v. Unity Industrial Life Ins., Etc., Ass'n · Carnes v. Atkins Bros. · Sandoz v. Veazie · Barton v. Kavanaugh · Graham v. Interstate Electric Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Sargent v. Polar Bar Ice Cream Co. Inc., La.App. 196 So. 541 , we allowed only $150, but there the plaintiff was arrested without any unusual noise or disturbance, and there was no crowd congregated. In fact, plaintiff was permitted to complete the sales which he was negotiating with two customers. He was put into a cell for an hour and a half and then transferred to another precinct station where he was not put into a cell, and where he remained only abount fifteen or twenty minutes before making bond and being released.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Buisson v. Prestia
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.