Gore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
26 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 625 So. 2d 146 - State v. Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he acts testified to by [Wayne] and Ettinger are acts relating to charges for which [Westbrook] is not presently on trial and are to be considered only for the limited purpose of showing proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident. You cannot and must not simply infer that the defendant acted in conformity with his previous acts and that he is therefore guilty of the charge for which he is presently on trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[ejvidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“'bear substantial resemblance to each other and with the present offense.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.