37 So. 3d 427 - Iles v. Ogden’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 1366
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · Canter v. Koehring Company · 623 So. 2d 1257 - Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. · 616 So. 2d 1234 - Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Michelle lies, and against the defendants, Roger H. Ogden, II, State of Louisiana, Louisiana Health Sciences Center, and American Alternative Insurance Corporation, for the balance of the judgment in the amount of $4,162,229.31. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the future medical expenses of $290,999.62 and the future related benefits (attendant care) of $3,127,768.58 awarded to the plaintiff, Michelle lies, shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of | ^Louisiana_Revised_Statutes 13:5106(b)(3)(c). 2 [Boldface in original; emphasis added by underlining.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“In the assessment of damages in cases of offenses, quasi offenses, and quasi contracts, much discretion must be left to the judge or jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.