37 So. 3d 939 - Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · Indiana v. Edwards · 698 So. 2d 248 - State v. Bowen · 688 So. 2d 901 - Hill v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Regardless of the defendant’s legal skills or the complexity of the case, the court shall not deny a defendant’s unequivocal request to represent himself or herself, if the court makes a determination of record that the defendant has made a knowing and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel, and does not suffer from severe mental illness to the point where the defendant is not competent to conduct trial proceedings by himself or herself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilson v. State“The record in this case contains nothing to suggest that Thompson fell within this exception to the general rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Losada v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.