Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 SW2D 211 - Perkins v. Nail

Perkins v. Nail’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1974
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ormsby v. Ratcliffe · McDonald v. International & Great Northern Railway Co. · W. A. Morgan & Bros. v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. · Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Zantzinger · Carsey v. Hawkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There must be an intention on the part of the plaintiff to contribute to his injuries and thereby make a case in order for the rule to have any application “In the instant case we have not a record which discloses, as a matter of law, that Mrs. Nail placed herself in this driveway with the intention of being injured, or at a time when she knew it was impossible for Jackson to stop the car and avoid the injury.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.