Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 SW2D 214 - Schucht v. Stidham

Schucht v. Stidham’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1965
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pope v. Beauchamp · Houston East & West Texas Railway Co. v. Runnels · Grand Fraternity v. Melton · Dunlap v. Wright · Felts v. Bell County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is within the knowledge of affiant just and true; that it is due and that all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits have been allowed,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.