Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 SW2D 280 - Walling v. Harendt

Walling v. Harendt’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 1953
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1953

10 state decisions

40193119401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Canty · Chace v. Gregg · Williams v. Sapieha · De La Vega v. League · Aycock v. Kimbrough

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A partition between joint owners does not confer title upon either, but has the effect only to dissolve the tenancy in. common, and leave the title as it was before, except to locate such rights as the parties may have, respectively, in the distinct parts of the premises, and to extinguish such rights in all other portions of that property.” Citing Arnold v. Cauble, 49 Tex. 527, 530 ; Davis v. Agnew, supra.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.