Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 TEX 34 - Cotton v. Jones

Cotton v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1873

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
June 1969
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1969

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

301873188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We are of the opinion that Article 1311, Paschal's Digest, which requires suit to be brought within three months, is not properly a statute of limitation which would be suspended under the provisions of Article 24, Paschal's Digest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.