Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

37 Tex. 515

Maxwell v. McCune

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873

Texas Supreme Court · decided 1873-07-01

Tried below before the Hon. R. H. Taylor. The material facts are indicated in the second head-note. The defense was set up by an amended answer, which, on motion of the plaintiffs, was stricken out by the -court below. Verdict and judgment being rendered for the plaintiffs, the defendant moved for a new trial, and that being refused, he appeals and assigns for error the striking out of his amended answer.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1882

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1873-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Walker, J.

¶1The defense set up in this action is utterly insufficient in law. The suit is by the assignees of a negotiable promissory note, against the maker, negotiated before maturity ; and the plaintiffs are not chargeable with notice of any rights or equities against the note.

¶2The note was given for the rent of the homestead of C. 3£. Hillburn. Hillburn and wife had given a deed of trust over the property. The husband subsequently went into bankruptcy, and it would appear that the bankrupt court regarded the property as passing to the assignee, and ordered the same to be sold as assets. Maxwell, the maker of the note, purchased the property with a full knowledge of all the facts.

¶3It is not for us to review the proceedings of the bankrupt court; but certainly all property exempt from forced sale under the laws of the different States is saved to the bankrupt under the proviso in Section 14 of the Bankrupt Act of March 2d, 1861. But it is unnecessary for us to follow the learned argument of counsel in this case. Admitting the law touching the bankrupt’s estate to be as claimed by the appellant, the appellees are still entitled to their judgment, and the judgment of the District Court is affirmed

¶4Affirmed.

/37/tex/515 · .json · Public domain