¶1This cause must be reversed for errors in the charge of the court to the jury.
¶2Suit was brought against the appellant for damages, resulting from the unskillful treatment of appellee by appellant, as a physician ; and the court charged the jury, “that if they believed “ the child was injured by the unskillful treatment, or ignorance, “ or carelessness, or neglect of the defendant as physician, then “ they should find for the plaintiff.” As no damages were asked or sought for carelessness or neglect, it was error to give the jury such an instruction, it being a well-settled principle of law and equity, that the judgment or decree of a court cannot exceed the prayer of the petition.
¶3We are also of the opinion that the court erred in refusing a new trial. There was certainly but little evidence to support the judgment. The only testimony offered by the plaintiff below, to prove the charge of unskillful treatment, was an old lady who made no profession of a knowledge of the practice of medicine; and even her testimony fell far short of establishing mal-practice or unskillful treatment, while two practicing physicians appear to disprove all suspicions of unskillful treatment.
¶4We are of the opinion that the law and justice demand that appellant have a new trial. The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded.
¶5Reversed and remanded.